1In the South African legal system, which court specifically utilizes an inquisitorial system rather than an adversarial one?
2
What is the technical term for the facts that a party must prove in order to win their case (the facts in issue)?
3According to the decision in Tregea v Godart, which of the following is true regarding the classification of the 'burden of proof'?
4According to the rule in R v Blom, what two conditions must be met for an inference to be drawn from circumstantial evidence in a criminal case?
5In a criminal case involving multiple co-accused, how does the ruling in S v Lubaxa affect a section 174 discharge application where no prima facie case exists against one of the accused?
6Which case established that South African courts can deviate from English decisions prior to 1961 if they conclude the English decision was an incorrect application of English law?
7The 'compendious mode' allows a lay witness to offer an opinion under which of the following circumstances?
8Under Menday v Protea Assurance Co, what requirements must be met before an expert witness can refer to a textbook as authority?
9If a court determines that the probabilities in a civil case are exactly equal, has the plaintiff discharged their burden of proof?
10What was the core reason the court in S v Nel refused to admit psychiatric evidence regarding a witness's low intelligence?
