1According to the course material, what are the primary requirements for the element of 'conduct' in delict?
2
Regarding the defense of automatism in the case of Molefe v Mahaeng 1999, which of the following statements are correct?
3In the context of Aquilian liability, how is 'voluntariness' defined in relation to conduct?
4Based on the principle of 'Antecedent Liability' (Wessels v Hall & Pickles), when can a defendant still be held liable despite acting in a state of automatism?
5Which statements regarding 'omissions' in the context of conduct are true?
6Regarding the proof of harm in delictual claims, which of the following are accurate according to the materials?
7Based on the case of Dhlamini v Protea Assurance 1974, why might a plaintiff fail to prove patrimonial harm?
8In Jowell v Bramwell-Jones 2000, what were the key considerations regarding the proof of loss?
9Which of the following describes the 'separation of issues' in delictual litigation?
10When analyzing the case of Wessels v Hall & Pickles, what specific factors led the court to find the defendant liable?
